====
Problems ? Solved
This blog offers something that even Wikipedia will not publish: opinions! All my own, too. So far, most postings are about books -- mainly fantasy and science fiction. The posts are by Agamedes Consulting: "Problems? Solved." For solutions to problems (or document reviews!) -- email nickleth at gmail dot com. No worries :-)
Think:
Why you should question everything
by Guy P Harrison
self-help
copyright 2013
read in December 2014
rated 7/10: well worth reading
This is a fascinating book, well worth reading. A fascinating book based on a flawed premise...
There are plenty of great examples of why we think wrong thoughts. Examples of why our minds are very easily confused. This is all brilliant food for thought -- and well worth reading.
But...
The author is a skeptic. Not just skeptical but A Skeptic. And the Skeptic approach is self-contradictory.
A Skeptic will only believe when an idea is soundly supported by facts. So science is Good. Yet a Skeptic will reject an idea if it is not supported by facts... A Skeptic had never seem a fairy at the bottom of the garden -- therefore, fairies do not exist !
No, sorry, lack of evidence is not the same as evidence against an idea.
The author rejects ideas because he has seen no evidence. An honest sceptic would allow for the possibility of truth -- until proven otherwise.
So it's a fascinating book. Read it and learn to think...
If only the author had learnt his own lessons !
"If he had a mind, there was something on it." PG Wodehouse, of a troubled Pongo Twistleton
====
Problems ? Solved
Feet of Clay
(Discworld # 19)
by Terry Pratchett
humour, fantasy
copyright 1996
read in January 2015
(and at least once, years ago)
rated 8/10: really quite good
I wanted to read (or re-read) a book that I knew I would enjoy. Good choice ! Feet of Clay has must-tell-someone humor, very likeable characters, complex plotting and social commentary.
Really. Quite. Good.
I don't really like the attitude of the Patrician to the Watch Commander. It makes me uncomfortable, perhaps because it is neither changed nor dealt with. Other people get their just rewards or punishments but not the Patrician. Still, that is an essential part of who he is...
What else can I say ?! This is a Discworld book. It's one of the best of the series.
Read it. Enjoy it. Have your social conscience tweaked. Laugh out loud. And be glad for a mostly happy ending.
Read a book and feel better about real life. Or at least, be more aware.
===
18feb22: read it again. Enjoyed it again.
And again did not like the Patrician's attitude towards the Watch Commander:-(
"If he had a mind, there was something on it." PG Wodehouse, of a troubled Pongo Twistleton
====
Problems ? Solved
The Innocence of Father Brown
by GK Chesterton
mystery
copyright 1911
read in January 2015
rated 6/10: read to pass the time
Five Father Brown novels all published in one volume. Is this a major resurgence of interest in GK Chesterton ? No... it's the result of a new TV series of Father Brown...
I read the very first story (each book is a series of short stories)... I read the first, many, many years ago. I remembered a few key incidents. I remembered enjoying the story...
I enjoyed it this time, too.
Each story is relatively simple. Not simple in plot -- the clues and red herrings are as complex as you would expect... Oh, perhaps I should mention... Farther Brown solves crimes. Following clues. Just like Sherlock Holmes.
Each story is just a narrow view on the world. A focus on the mystery. Very little background, almost every word is essential to understanding and solving the crime.
I did manage to solve some of the mysteries. Never the entire plot ! But enough to satisfy my need to believe that the reader could, in fact, solve the crime...
Traditional mysteries leave me cold. It seems to me, that the red herrings are just as likely as the stated solution... The only reason that a particular clue is a red herring is that the author has selected another, equally likely set of clues to be the truth...
Father Brown stories leave me feeling that the solution is, in fact, the best and only solution.
Several of the stories also have mystic musings. There is often a feeling, amongst the characters, of moral outrage tempered by forgiveness. Not surprising, since the detective is a priest !
I enjoyed the first book of stories. Perhaps I'll read another book, in a year or two. It was fun but not enough fun to want to bury myself in another dozen short stories.
It's an enjoyable book, with well thought out mysteries. If you're a fan of...
I almost wrote, a fan of whodunits... Which made me think... As often as not, Father Brown is solving the mystery of *why*dunit.
For me it was an enjoyable way to pass the time. If you enjoy mysteries, you should rate this book a little higher.
"If he had a mind, there was something on it." PG Wodehouse, of a troubled Pongo Twistleton
====
Problems ? Solved
The Best of all Possible Worlds
by Karen Lord
science fiction, chick lit
copyright 2014
read in January 2015
rated 6/10: read to pass the time
The title says it all. A happy story about happy people. A few moral issues quickly solved... or declared to be too hard to solve.
Plus the glaringly obvious romance, gradually developing. An interesting background to the heroine's reluctance to commit. And then she takes off her glasses, shakes out her hair and realised that she is beautiful...
Well, okay, not that last bit. But almost :-)
The beginning is a bit hard to follow. It took me a while to understand the background. That's not necessarily a problem, I had learnt enough before the end of the book.
So is it a good book ?
Well, yes. Good but not great. Easy reading, nice characters, simple plot. Science fiction ideas... gradually morphing into chick lit.
If I'd never read it, i would not have missed it. But I found it easy to read. And I did enjoy it.
"If he had a mind, there was something on it." PG Wodehouse, of a troubled Pongo Twistleton
====
Problems ? Solved
The Black Guard
(The Long War #1)
AJ Smith
fantasy
copyright 2013
read in January 2015
rated 7/10: well worth reading
There are good people. There are bad people. And there are several people on the bad side who appear to be good. Who can see that not all is well on their own team. But who support their own team because that's the honorable thing to do.
Not that good and bad are all that clear !
The key drivers of the bad team have -- in my opinion -- half of a good idea. Get rid of the gods who are using humans as pawns in the gods' own battle. (The Long War.) Get rid of the gods is a good idea. Replacing them with another god is a stupid idea. I'm not really in favour of humans as pawns in someone else's war.
The goodness of the good team is also a matter of opinion. They fight for honour, they are generally nice people, they kill for freedom -- and for politics. Vicious Vikings, complete with berserker rages. Still... A very likeable lot.
The story itself, is very complex. The Long War world is very complex. Luckily enough, the key characters -- and there are lots of them -- are well defined. And the three or so main plot threads are also well defined. I had very little trouble remembering who was who. And no trouble at all following the various plots.
It's a complex world. It's a complex story. Plenty of action, plenty of scheming. There are many, many characters. Yet it is all well written and easy to read...
And on the down side: the writing style is not the best.
In some parts -- more noticeably in the first half of the book -- there is a tendency to write as a series of actions to be listed. It needs a bit more feeling. A bit more atmosphere. To bring the reader closer to the forces which are driving the characters.
So there's a lack of emotional involvement in the first half of the book. Perhaps, due in part to my unfamiliarity with the characters. This is balanced by the excellent detail of the action, of the world and of the characters.
There is also a lot of death and violence. Mostly in battles, some in the day to day dealings of violent people. The violence is there -- but it is not a central feature of the book.
Yes, people are killed. No, the deaths are not detailed in gratuitous glee. It's nasty but it's not sickening.
Then, the end...
The book is clearly first of a series. It ends with battle lines clearly drawn: we know what they're fighting for, we know who is on which side. (Mostly.) It is also a satisfying conclusion.
The book ends with several clear conclusions. No-one is left hanging by a thread off a cliff. The war -- rather, this small part of the Long War -- has only just begun. Yet this book provides a clear ending -- a point of safety for the main characters.
The Black Guard can be read and enjoyed as a standalone book. It also leaves me wanting to read more. An excellent balance, with a satisfying ending -- and plenty of clear hooks into more books in the series.
"He who hesitate, meditates in the horizontal position" ... Monk Han Wukong, per Charlie Human
====
Problems ? Solved
A Plague of Demons
by Keith Laumer
science fiction
copyright 1965
read in October 2014
rated 7/10: well worth reading
This is good, fun, old fashioned science fiction adventure. Rated up because... well... it's from the good old days of science fiction :-)
And I've read it before. Though I've never read it before. Eh ?!
Yes, I've read it before. Many, many years ago. In my youth. I've thought of it since then, and wondered if it would be as good from my current point of view. And now I've read it again.
And yet... This time... it's different !
Human brains, stolen from Earth-normal humans. Programmed to run alien war machines. Take over the machines, beat the aliens, return to Earth...
Except that I remember a pastoral version of Earth. Meditation is the thing. The achievement of absolute internal peace results in -- your mind being snatched by aliens. In this version the aliens are on Earth, in disguise, stealing brains in the middle of local wars.
In my youth, the story contained the classic line, "The minutes crawled by like stepped-on roaches." The hero is waiting for an opportunity to sneak by some guards. In this version, there's the same classic line. In a completely different scene !
Did Laumer write two versions of his brain-snatching story ? Is one an expanded -- and varied -- version of an original novella ? I don't know...
And, interesting as it is, I don't really care :-)
It's fun, it's exciting, the good guys win. And I like that in a book :-)
====
Problems ? Solved
Winning Colours
(Serrano Legacy #3)
by Elizabeth Moon
science fiction
copyright 1995
read in December 2014
rated 6/10: read to pass the time
A chapter or two on horses which I could have done without. Sure, a main character is mad on horses. But it does nothing for the plot.
Apart from that -- another light and enjoyable adventure. Chick lit but not in a bad way. There is some emphasis on clothing, a sure identifier of chick lit. The main identifier is that the heroes... are all heroines.
Interesting, that... now I think about it...
Some chick lit has male heroes -- and swooning heroines. That's the chick lit that I find hard to read. The swooning female attitude is just embarrassing. To me. I prefer a female character with some independent strength. Whether as heroine, or not.
Apart from the basic action and adventure -- which is all good fun -- Winning Colours raises an interesting issue... the effects of virtual immortality for a select few...
Not a new issue, perhaps. Yet I don't remember other books which look at the effect on families. What happens when father runs the family business -- and will never retire ?!
Plus the interesting thought that the very old may be bored by adults who are merely one hundred years old !
So it's fun and adventure and space battles and... horse trading. With some interesting what-if ideas...
A light and enjoyable book. With just a bit more meat than expected.
====
Problems ? Solved
Stealing Light
(Shoal #1)
by Gary Gibson
science fiction
copyright 2007
read in December 2014
rated 5/10: readable, but only if there's nothing else
Hard science fiction, death and suffering, ultimately pointless. As a mindless piece of science fiction, five out of ten may be a bit harsh. But really, this book is... stupid.
First, it jumps all over the place. Fragmented flashbacks... which contain other flashbacks. Back-flashbacks ?
The key flashback is to "the Port Gabriel incident". The details are scattered throughout the book. Not in sequence, either. Most of the flashback fragments contain their own flash-further-backs.
And look ! It's mind control, right ?! That becomes glaringly obvious, halfway through the book. Doesn't stop the "slow reveal" flashbacks though.
Then there's the heroine. A troubled woman with electronic superpowers. Several times she threatens someone... "If this is a doublecross then you'll be the first to die!" Not only does she never follow through -- she clearly has no ability to follow through ! In terms of physical threat, this woman is at the bottom of the pecking order.
Yet she is the one person who is chosen to save the universe from self-destruction ! Really ? Why ?!
Then there's the driving force behind all the killing and violence... It seems -- to possibly spoil an unbelievable plot -- that one race of aliens is "protecting" all the others by hiding destructive technology. So we can all live in peace and harmony and ignorance.
The worlds that we see, are run by a brutally despotic government. Within that, the religious nutters are fighting to the death with the rule by the knife nutters. There are also the various gangsters and warlords, who are powerful enough to run their own armies and space navies...
This is the peace and love that the aliens are lying and killing to preserve. Puh-lease !
Then there's the final dash to safety... Oh no ! Will they get there in time ?! Good grief ! Why can't the super spaceships just fly a bit closer ?! And what happened to the two spaceships which were also waiting for the heroine ?! Were they -- controlled by artificial intelligences -- also too stupid to avoid destruction ?
There's a lot of action and adventure. Interspersed by even longer -- so it seems -- and pointless -- descriptions of technology.
Hard science fiction. Soft on logic and plot. Easy to read. Not very well written
Disappointing, really.
====
Problems ? Solved